Drake Irving ( talk) 01:15, (UTC)Īs long as we're in agreement of what to use for all articles for sake of consistency, go for it. We should really just be consistent throughout the wiki in this regard. 'Unlockable Character' can be, albeit often isn't, misleading. It should be Playable Character (Unlockable). It was Camilo113 who put it there, but I moved it from the role line to the description line. Go to this page and see for yourself, and I did not put it there. Kaguya was never an unlockable character, it's only her route that is unlockable. As are most of the Extra Stage bosses, I guess. I'd like to add that Kaguya was an unlockable character, but never playable. If there really is no opposition to this, I shall go through all /char pages and change 'Unlockable Character' to the other one soon (unless someone else does this). As far as I can tell, having 'Playable Character (Unlockable)' would be the most supportive. It's been awhile now since this was discussed. I thought that, because of this, it would be a kind of conclusion to keep it that way, especially for other places, but I was wrong. Originally on the PoFV char page, the edit war stopped and kept the roles as "Playable Character (Unlockable)". ![]() Apparently, both terms are the same and Nintenchris5963 chose one over the other because it looks better based on my point of view, they are not the same. I've yet to see any valid reason why "Unlockable Character" would be preferable. Not only just that, it doesn't flow correctly with other characters that's just got "Playable Character". Yes, we've got sub-headings saying "Playable Characters", but we still need to indicate it as such next to each character, following the tradition of this wiki listing characters' roles. ![]() "Playable Character (Unlockable)" is very thorough in its meaning. I try to think logically and thoroughly to the best I can what does "Unlockable Character" mean specifically? An unlockable player? Unlockable boss? It sounds ambiguous. My prime argument to use "Playable Character (Unlockable)" over "Unlockable Character" is that it's being specific in what it's referring to. First of all, I had no intentions of being part of this edit war I find it distressing and also wish for it to stop. As for the other games, they also changed the texts for IaMP and SWR to "Unlockable character", but then again the previous text ("boss character") was even less descriptive. They were even given a warning previously. They clearly have been deserving of having their editing rights frozen for a long time, and this new edit war only supports this. Kiefmaster99 ( talk) 02:53, (UTC) This user has also vandalized the Phantasmagoria of Flower View page in exactly the same manner. In which case, we all still need to come to a common agreement on what to use for all of the articles. HM used to use "playable character" in earlier revisions, but it was changed by the same user to "unlockable". Hopeless Masquerade uses "Unlockable Character", so unless someone has a very, very good reason to use the other, it gets strong support from me.:Alternatively, we can change the format of all of the other fighting games to something else. ULiL is primarily a fighting game, and ought to follow the formats of, in descending order, Hopeless Masquerade (direct sequel), SWR/soku/IaMP, PoFV, and then others. That said, at this present time, I actually do find stronger support for use of "Unlockable Character" over "Playable Character (Unlockable)". Second, how about we actually assess the merits of relevant arguments, and use Talk Pages for disputes? "I got here first" is a piss-poor reason to justify any edit, and will bring negative attention from anybody. ![]() First of all, the current edit war needs to stop.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |